Sharing about English Lesson

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Grammar. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Grammar. Tampilkan semua postingan

DEFINING RELATIVE CLAUSE

1) DEFINING RELATIVE CLAUSES

Refer to the clauses that give the information that tell you which nouns the speaker is talking about.
Who for people as subject or object:

Example:
- The candidate who was chosen comes from Siem Reap.
- The candidate who we chose comes from Siem Reap.
Whom for people as object:

Example: The candidate whom I selected is very great.
Which for things and animals as subject and object:

Example:
- The school which is called NIS is very famous in Kampong Speu.
- The school which I study is very famous in Kampong Speu.
That for people, things, animals as subject and object:

Example: The computer that broke down is Mr. Rathas.
Where for places:
Example: I want to live in USA where many people always dream about.

Whose for people, things, animals, places as possessive:
Example: I know the man whose son was killed last night.

Remember:
- Whom is mainly used in formal written English and who is more common in conversation when they are the object of the verb.
- Who, that, which can be omitted when they are the object of the verb.

2) NON-DEFINING RELATIVE CLAUSES

Refer to the clauses that give extra information about nouns the speaker refers to.
Who for people as subject or object:

Example:
- The candidate, who was chosen, comes from Siem Reap.
- The candidate, who we chose, comes from Siem Reap.

Whom for people as object:
Example: The candidate, whom I selected, is very great.
Which for things and animals as subject and object:

Example:
- The school, which is called NIS, is very famous in Kampong Speu.
- The school, which I study, is very famous in Kampong Speu.

Where for places:
Example: I want to live in USA, where many people always dream about.
Whose for people, things, animals, places as possessive:

Example: I know Mr. Sokha, whose son was killed last night.

Remember:
- Whom is mainly used in formal written English and who is more common in conversation when they are the object of the verb.
- That cannot be used in a non-defining relative clause.
- Who, which cannot be omitted when they are the object of the verb.
- Commas are use to separate the relative clause.

Kinds of Adverb Clause in English Grammar

An adverbial clause is dependent clause introduced by an adverbial subordinator. It is used to modify the verb of the independent clause and tells when (time), where (place), why (reason), for what purpose, how, how long, and how far. It is also used to show contrast and concession.

1) Punctuation Rules
An adverbial clause can come either before or after the independent clause.
Formula:
- Adverbial clause + , + Independent clause (a comma after adverbial clause)
- Independent clause + Adverbial clause (no comma after adverbial clause)
Example:
- As he didn�t understand, he asked the teacher to explain.
- He asked the teacher to explain as he didn�t understand.
 
2) Types of Adverbial Clauses
There are several different kinds of adverbial clauses; in addition, the subordinators can distinguish the different types of adverbial clauses.
a) Adverb Clause of Time
We use adverb clause of time to modify verb in main clause and to tell the time that an action takes place.
Subordinating Conjunctions: when, whenever, anytime, before, after, till, until, while, since, just as, as soon as, as often as, now that, as long as �
Example:
- She ran away while I was sleeping.
- While I was sleeping, she ran away.
b) Adverb Clause of Place
We use adverb clause of place to modify verb in main clause and to tell the place that an action takes place.
Subordinating Conjunctions: where, as far as, as near as, wherever, anywhere�
Example:
- She is always drunk wherever I meet her.
- Wherever I meet her, she is always drunk.
c) Adverb Clause of Manner
We use adverb clause of manner to modify verb in main clause and to tell how an action takes place.
Subordinating Conjunctions: as if, as though, as
Example:
- The boy speaks as if he is sick.
- As if he is sick, the boy speaks.
d) Adverb Clause of Cause/Reason
We use adverb clause of cause/reason to modify verb in main clause and to tell the cause that an action takes place.
Subordinating Conjunctions: because, as, for, that
Example:
- I come here because I want to meet you.
- Because I want to meet you, I come here.
e) Adverb Clause of Condition
We use adverb clause of condition to modify verb in main clause and to tell the condition that an action takes place or someone does something.
Subordinating Conjunctions: if, whether, if � not, unless, supposing that, provided that, in the condition that, as long as that
Example:
- I will commit suicide unless you love me.
- Unless you love me, I will commit suicide.
f) Adverb Clause of Purpose
We use adverb clause of purpose to modify verb in main clause and to tell the aim that someone does something or something happens.
Subordinating Conjunctions: so that, in order that,
Example:
- I tell him everyday in order that he can remember.
- In order that he can remember, I tell him everyday.
Remember:
Sometimes we can use �so as to, in order to� to stand instead of �so that, in order that�.
Sentence + so that / in order that + subject + verb + complement.
Sentence + so as to / in order to + verb + complement.
Example:
- I bring my dictionary with me in order that I can check.
- I bring my dictionary with me in order to check.
g) Adverb Clause of Result/Consequence
We use adverb clause of result/consequence to modify verb in main clause and to tell the result that someone does something or something happens.
Subordinating Conjunctions:that� is used to recognize adverb clause of result
Subject + verb + so + adjective/adverb + that + subject + verb + comp
Example:
- She is so hungry that she has lunch early.
- That she has lunch early, she is so hungry.
Subject + verb + such + noun(s) + that + subject + verb + complement
Example:
- She acts such a rude manner that no man loves her.
- That no man loves her, she acts such a rude manner.
h) Adverb Clause of Concession/Contrast
We use adverb clause of concession/contrast to modify verb in main clause and it is introduced by the below-written subordinating conjunctions:
Subordinating Conjunctions: though, however, even though, even if, although, so, in spite of the fact that, the fact that, despite that, whether or, granted that, whoever, whatever, whichever, no matter what, whereas, while
Example:
- I have never committed crime although I am poor.
- Although I am poor, I have never committed crime.
i) Adverb Clause of Degree
We use adverb clause of degree to modify verb in main clause.
Subordinating Conjunctions: according to as, according to how
Example:
- She will be paid according to how she works.
- According to how she works, she will be paid.
j) Adverb Clause of Means
We use adverb clause of means to modify verb in main clause.
Subordinating Conjunctions: by the fact that, by whatever means, by what means.
Example:
- You can recognize her easily by the fact that she speaks loudly.
- By the fact that she speaks loudly, you can recognize her easily.
k) Adverb Clause of Comparison
We use adverb clause of comparison to modify verb in main clause.
Subordinating Conjunctions: small, fast, hard, slow, late�
Subject + verb + as + adjective/adverb + as + subject + verb + comp
Example:
- Your book is as small as my book is.
- You speak as fast as she does.
Sub + verb + adj/adv-er /more-adj/adv + than + sub + verb + comp
Example:
- She runs faster than I do.
- They speak more fluently than he does.

Deduction of Adverb Clause

1) Adverb Clause of Times

 Subject in the main clause and subject in the adverb clause must be the same.
Example: When Anna arrives at the airport, she feels happy.
a) Subject in adverb clause is moved to replace subject in main clause and subject in main clause is omitted.
b) Verb form is changed to ing-form (verb-ing)
c) We can omit subordinating conjunction but since or before, we cannot omit.

Example:
- When Anna arrives at the airport, she feels happy. Or
- Arriving at the airport, Anna feels happy.

2) Adverb Clause of Reason
 
Subject in the main clause and subject in the adverb clause must be the same.
Example: Because Nita loves me, she agrees to devote her time to me.
a) Subject in adverb clause is moved to replace subject in main clause and subject in main clause is omitted.
b) Verb form is changed to ing-form (verb-ing)
c) Subordinating conjunction is omitted.

Example:
- Because Nita loves me, she agrees to devote her time to me. Or
- Loving me, Nita agrees to devote her time to me.

Kinds of Conditionals on English Grammar

1) ZERO CONDITIONAL
We zero conditional to express general truths and facts (often things based on scientific fact) and we use with the simple present tense.
Formation
If + Present Tense,
Present Tense
If you heat water to 100�C,
it boils.
Present Tense
if + Present Tense
Water boils
if you heat it to 100�C.
Example:
- If you drop an apple, it falls. = An apple falls if you drop it. (This is an absolute truth based on scientific fact - gravity).
- If you don't do your homework, I am disappointed. = I am disappointed if you don't do your homework. (This is a general truth based on previous knowledge - you know that I am disappointed if people don't do their homework).
NOTE: Most zero conditional sentences mean the same thing if "when" is used instead of "if".
2) FIRST CONDITIONAL
We use first conditional to express situations based on fact in the present or future (things which may happen) and we use with the simple future tense with �will�.
Formation
If + Present Tense,
Future �will�
If I go there,
I will see our teacher.
Future �will�
if + Present Tense
I will see our teacher
if I go there.
NOTE:
- We never use will or won't in the �if clause�.
- We often use unless which means �if ... not�.
Example:
- If I have time today, I will phone my friend. = I will phone my friend if I have time today. (It is possible that I will have time � therefore the condition is real).
- If I go to England, I will buy some Cheddar cheese. = I will buy some Cheddar cheese if I go to England. (It is possible that I will go to England - therefore the condition is real).

3) SECOND CONDITIONAL

We use second conditional to express unreal situations in the present or future. It is often used to express a wish with the simple past tense and �would�.

Formation

If + Past Simple,
Past Future �would�
If I were you,
I would marry her.
Past Future �would�
if + Past Simple
I would marry her
if I were you.
NOTE: We never use would or wouldn't in the �if clause�.
Example:
- If I were you, I wouldn't do that. = I wouldn't do that if I were you. (I am not you - therefore the condition is unreal).
- If I had more time, I would do more on my websites. = I would do more on my websites if I had more time. (I don't have more time - therefore the condition is unreal).

4) THIRD CONDITIONAL
We use third conditional to express conditions in the past that did not happen. It is often used to express criticism or regret with would have, could have or should have and we use third conditional with the past perfect tense.
Formation
If + Past Perfect,
Past Future Perfect
If I had met her,
I would have told her about my heart.
If I had met her,
I could have told her about my heart.
If I had met her,
I should have told her about my heart.
Past Future Perfect
if + Past Perfect
I would have told her about my heart
if I had met her.
I could have told her about my heart
if I had met her.
I should have told her about my heart
if I had met her.
NOTE: We never use would have, or wouldn't have etc in the �if clause�.
Example:
- If I hadn't helped you, you would have failed. = You would have failed if I hadn't helped you. (I helped you so you didn't fail).
- If it had been sunny, we could have gone out. = We could have gone out if it had been sunny. (We didn't go out because it wasn't sunny).

Exceptions of Conditional

So far you have only learned the basic rules for Conditional Sentences. It depends on the context, however, which tense to use. So sometimes it's possible for example that in an �If Clause Type 1� another tense than Simple Present is used, e.g. Present Progressive or Present Perfect.
Conditional Sentences Type 1 (likely)
Condition refers to:
If Clause
Main Clause
future action
Simple Present
If the book is interesting, �
Future I
�I will buy it.
action going on now
Present Progressive
If he is snoring, �
Future I
�I will wake him up.
finished action
Present Perfect
If he has moved into his new flat, �
Future I
�we will visit him.
improbable action
should + Infinitive
If she should win this race, �
Future I
�I will congratulate her.
present facts
Simple Present
If he gets what he wants, �
Simple Present
�he is very nice.
Conditional Sentences Type 2 (unlikely)
Condition refers to:
If Clause
Main Clause
present / future event
Simple Past
If I had a lot of money, �
Conditional 1
�I would travel around the world.
result in the past
Simple Past
If I knew him, �
Conditional 2
�I would have said hello.
Conditional Sentences Type 2 (impossible)

Condition refers to:
If Clause
Main Clause
present
Past Perfect
If I had known it, �
Conditional 1
�I would not be here now.
past
Past Perfect
If he had learned for the test, �
Conditional 2
�he would not have failed it.

Definition of Noun Clause and Examples

A noun clause is a subordinate clause that functions as a noun; and it can be the subject, object of verb in the principal clause it depends on.
There are three kinds of noun clauses:



- That Clause is made from statement.
- Wh-question Clause is made from wh-question.
- Yes / No question Clause is made from yes/no question.

1) That Clause:
Subject + verb + that clause

Example:
- She said that she missed me.
- The problem is that no one answered the question.

2) Wh-question Clause: (Subordinator: who, when, what, where, why, how, whoever, whatever, wherever)
Subject + verb + object (subordinator + subject + verb + ...)

Example:
- She wants to ask where I live.
- I want to know how we can meet each other.

3) Yes / No question Clause: (Subordinator: whether (or not), if (or not)
Subject + verb + object (subordinator + subject + verb + ...)

Example:
- They ask whether I am happy or not.
- He wonders if she loves him or not.

a) Introductory Clause Verbs:
agree answer conclude notice realize think remind warn admit reply tell write
assure promise mention convince show inform teach explain notify point out

b) Subjunctive Noun Clause: The verb in a dependent that-clause must be kept in the simple form after certain introductory clause verbs and adjectives indicating urgency and advisability.
Introductory Verbs and Adjectives:

Verbs
Adjectives
advice
demand
move
recommend
ask
direct
propose
suggest
command
insist
urge
order
advisable
essential
necessary
urgent
important
vital

Example:
- I advice him that he go to school.
- I suggest that they be not lazy.
- It is essential that everyone try hard to study English.
- It is necessary that our country have to take actions on drug and corruption.

Collectives


The use of a plural verb here (Daily Telegraph, 14 March 2013) may look like a mistake to readers unfamiliar with British English (BrE).

In BrE, collective nouns such as team, family and committee are often treated as plural when the emphasis is on their members acting as individuals rather than on the collective as a single unit, hence:

This year is team are especially strong.
The family next door are always shouting at each other.
The new commitee are the friendliest I 've ever worked with.

The use of the plural is sentences such as My bank are very reliable, and in the example above from the Daily Telegraph, would not be unusual in BrE, but this would probably be more colloquial and informal.

Look Forward To


The highlighted (The New Paper, 31 May 2013) is wrong.

The writer has obviously misanalysed the to as being part of an infinitive, i.e. to study � an error that is exceedingly common in Singapore, even among members of the teaching profession.

It is worth remembering that there are two types of to: one is a preposition (e.g. Jane went to Munich last month); the other helps us form to-infinitives (e.g. to travel).

The to in the highlighted portion of the article is in fact a preposition: it belongs to the multiword verb look forward to, often also called a phrasal-prepositional verb because it has the structure verb+adverb+preposition.

As is required of prepositions, look forward to is followed by a noun, or something functioning as a noun, in this case the clause (more specifically, a noun clause) studying at the polytechnic ... supposed to start yesterday. If I am asked �What was he looking forward to?� the answer would be �Studying at the polytechnic ...�, not �Study at the polytechnic...�.

Police Is/Are


A short article (Straits Times Interactive, 30 May 2013), but one containing quite a few errors (or non-standard usages, if you will).

First, molest in Standard English can only be a verb; in Singapore English, however, it is both a noun and a verb. The standard noun form required here was molestation.

Secondly, police in Standard English is a collective noun that is treated as plural; hence, the opening line of the article should have read The police are investigating ....

There should also be commas before the relative clauses who was accused of molesting a student and which happened on April 5, because they are non-defining (or non-restrictive).

Finally, the modifier by the student is badly placed, making it seem as if it belongs in a noun phrase inappropriate behaviour by the student. Placing it after the verb accused would be an improvement, giving us the much clearer The lecturer had been accused by the student of inappropriate behaviour.

Who/Whom


The highlighted relative pronoun is wrong; it should be who (Sunday Times, 19 May 2013).

The incorrect whom seems to be the result of the author mistaking it for the object of I think (i.e. *I think whom), when in fact it is merely parenthetical. The relative clause is therefore saying who (I thought) were quite the perfect Hollywood couple.

Why, then, the subject pronoun who rather than the object pronoun whom? Because who is the subject of the relative clause: it stands in for Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, so the relative clause is in effect saying Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were quite the perfect Hollywood couple.

Topic�comment


The above (Sunday Times, 12 May 2013) is an interesting example of a topic�comment (or left-dislocation) structure in Singapore English (SgE).

Where Standard English has the sentence structure subject�predicate, SgE often has topic�comment, where the topic of the sentence is stated, and then a comment is added to it. 

In the sentence above, the topic of the sentence is Linna Tay, mother of national swimmer Jerryl Yong begins the sentence; for may be thought of as a topic marker which separates the topic from the comment. In the comment clause, the topic �reappears� as the subject; this is called a resumptive pronoun.

(A subject�predicate counterpart of the above would be Linna Tay, mother of national swimmer Jerryl Yong, has to ....)

While topic�comment is more typical of Singapore Colloquial English (SCE, or Singlish), it is also fairly common in more formal uses (such as formal newspaper reports and student essays), which led me to argue in my PhD thesis (Cambridge, 2007) that there is good reason to believe that all of SgE is, in fact, underlyingly topic�comment rather than subject�predicate.

Years Old


The highlighted (Straits Times Interactive, 17 May 2013) should not be hyphenated.

It is hyphenated only if it is used atributively; that is, it comes before a noun, e.g. a 38-year-old footballer. Note also the singular unit of measure in this case, i.e. year (not years).

Otherwise, there are no hyphens, and the unit of measure is plural; e.g. The footballer is 38 years old.

Criteria/Criterion


Two mistakes in the Straits Times Interactive (16 May 2013).

The first highlighted word, criteria, is plural, so the singular criterion should have been used instead: one new criterion. (Another common singular/plural pair is phenomenon/phenomena.)

The second is a more glaring mistake: the authorities is plural, so the highlighted verb should have been are. The noun phrase the authorities is the subject of its relative clause (i.e. (which/that) the authorities are considering), so the verb needs to agree with it.

Inversion


The singular verb comes is wrong (Daily Telegraph, 5 October 2012) because it has erroneously been made to agree with the singular noun immediately preceding it, i.e. focus.

Rather, the verb should agree with drawbacks, the real subject in this sentence, which is an example of subject�adverbial version. Sans inversion the constituent order would have been
But drawbacks come with this narrow focus.

Subject�Verb Agreement


This example of a subject�verb agreement error is from the online version of The Straits Times (11 April 2013).

The third-person singular present tense �s marker on the highlighted verb is wrong because NUS and NTU form a plural subject.

They cannot collectively be thought of as a single entity; otherwise they would not be occupying two different positions in the ranking.

A good test of this would be to replace NUS and NTU with an appropriate pronoun and see which works best � it should be obvious that the plural they rather than the singular it is needed here.

The Arts Inspire


This is from a series of outdoor advertisements that appeared throughout Singapore last year as part of the Arts Festival.

The arts inspires me is wrong because arts here is a count noun, and plural. The correct verb would have been inspire.