Home » Posts filed under Language
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Language. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Language. Tampilkan semua postingan
Diffused/Defused
The verb needed in both cases was defused (Today 27 June 2011). Both diffuse and defuse are commonly confused, almost certainly because they are near-homophones.
Defuse (/?di?'fju?z/) means �to stop a possibly dangerous or difficult situation from developing, especially by making people less angry or nervous� (Oxford Advanced Learner�s), and is clearly the meaning intended here.
Diffuse (/d?'fju?z/), on the other hand, means �to spread something or become spread widely in all directions�.
The verb needed in both cases was defused (Today 27 June 2011). Both diffuse and defuse are commonly confused, almost certainly because they are near-homophones.
Defuse (/?di?'fju?z/) means �to stop a possibly dangerous or difficult situation from developing, especially by making people less angry or nervous� (Oxford Advanced Learner�s), and is clearly the meaning intended here.
Diffuse (/d?'fju?z/), on the other hand, means �to spread something or become spread widely in all directions�.
Verbal
The word verbal is often imprecise in meaning. Most people use it to mean �spoken� or �oral�, so a verbal agreement is one that is spoken and not written down.
Pedants, however, insist that technically it means �involving words� � that is, it may be spoken or written. This broader meaning of verbal may be usefully contrasted with non-verbal, for example a nod to indicate �yes�.
Pedants, however, insist that technically it means �involving words� � that is, it may be spoken or written. This broader meaning of verbal may be usefully contrasted with non-verbal, for example a nod to indicate �yes�.
No Outside Food
In Singapore, signs like the above are very common. You�ll find them in restaurants and caf�s whose owners, perhaps understandably, want to restrict the use of their tables to their customers. In this context, the term outside food refers to food bought elsewhere, i.e. not from the restaurant or caf� displaying the sign. It may also be used as an antonym of home-cooked food.
Among campaigners for good English in Singapore, there is a sense that the above message is non-standard and hence to be discouraged. The following sign appears to be an attempt at expressing the same message in Standard English.
I am not entirely sure that this is an improvement, for it does not sound very idiomatic either, i.e. not something a native speaker (however you choose to define her or him) would say. Perhaps it is necessary to recast it more radically, as any one of the following (or variants thereof):
These tables are for the consumption of food purchased/bought here only.
These tables are for our customers only.
Only for the consumption of food purchased here.
Only for food purchased here.
Not for the consumption of food bought elsewhere.
You�ll probably agree that this little exercise is a good example of a cure being worse than the original ailment! Note that, by comparison with any of the above, the original message, No outside food allowed, is beautifully concise, precise and immediately comprehensible, at least in Singapore.
Punctuation
(a)
(b)
Can you, at a glance, tell whether each abstract (from Kazuo Ishiguro�s When We Were Orphans) is from a British or an American publisher?
The answer is that (a) is from an American publisher (Alfred A. Knopf, 2000) and (b), from a British publisher (Faber & Faber, 2000).
Quotation marks are usually the most obvious clue: Americans prefer double quotes, whereas the British prefer single quotes: compare �interrogating� and �interrogating�, for instance.
A second difference is the placement of the full-stop: compare �such an odd bird at school.� with �such an odd bird at school�. American practice always has the punctuation inside the quotes, even if a fragment is being quoted (as here), whereas in British practice it depends on whether the punctuation was part of the original quote, a grammatically complete sentence, and so on.
A third clue to (a) being American is the full-stop in St. Dunstan�s: American editorial practice generally uses full-stops in abbreviations; by contrast, modern British practice has largely dispensed with them altogether. In older British practice, however, full-stops were used in all abbreviations except contractions, i.e. the first and last letters of the full word were retained. Hence, Dr for doctor but Prof. for Professor. (However, to avoid confusion, St. was used for street and St for saint.)
Surprisingly, the word judgement in the US edition retains the British spelling, with the e as underlined � perhaps to keep the British identity of the protagonist. In British English, judgement is used in non-legal contexts, and judgment in legal ones. Hence, In my judgement, this judge is not qualified to pass judgment on this case (but judgment in both instances in American English).
�ise vs �ize
Are criticize, analyze and televize American spellings?
Some quick answers: criticize is also possible in British English (BrE); analyze is found only in American English (AmE); and televize is possible in neither.
There is a widespread misconception that �ize is AmE and �ise, BrE. It is worth remembering, however, that �ize has been in the English language since the 16th century � long before the founding of the United States of America as we know it.
While �ize is standard in AmE, it is also used by many BrE writers. Reputable British publishers such as the Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, Longman and Macmillan, and newspapers such The Times, prefer �ize on the grounds that it is closer to the Greek root �izo (whereas �ise is French).
There are many words, however, which cannot, for etymological reasons, be spelt with �ize: advertise, advise, arise, circumcise, compromise, excise, exercise, improvise, incise, merchandise, premise, promise, revise, supervise, surmise, surprise and televise, to name a few.
Another point to note is that words ending in �yse cannot be spelt �yze in BrE, even by writers who prefer �ize: for example, analyse, catalyse, and paralyse. (These spellings retain the s from the noun forms analysis, catalysis, and paralysis.) In AmE, however, only �yze is used: analyze, catalyze, paralyze.
Hence, �yze is the only true AmE-only spelling, whereas �ize, though used chiefly in AmE, is hardly an American spelling since it has been in continuous use in BrE for the past five centuries.
Are criticize, analyze and televize American spellings?
Some quick answers: criticize is also possible in British English (BrE); analyze is found only in American English (AmE); and televize is possible in neither.
There is a widespread misconception that �ize is AmE and �ise, BrE. It is worth remembering, however, that �ize has been in the English language since the 16th century � long before the founding of the United States of America as we know it.
While �ize is standard in AmE, it is also used by many BrE writers. Reputable British publishers such as the Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, Longman and Macmillan, and newspapers such The Times, prefer �ize on the grounds that it is closer to the Greek root �izo (whereas �ise is French).
There are many words, however, which cannot, for etymological reasons, be spelt with �ize: advertise, advise, arise, circumcise, compromise, excise, exercise, improvise, incise, merchandise, premise, promise, revise, supervise, surmise, surprise and televise, to name a few.
Another point to note is that words ending in �yse cannot be spelt �yze in BrE, even by writers who prefer �ize: for example, analyse, catalyse, and paralyse. (These spellings retain the s from the noun forms analysis, catalysis, and paralysis.) In AmE, however, only �yze is used: analyze, catalyze, paralyze.
Hence, �yze is the only true AmE-only spelling, whereas �ize, though used chiefly in AmE, is hardly an American spelling since it has been in continuous use in BrE for the past five centuries.




